Concrete Works

Pulverized fly ash as cement replacement – how it works?

Pulverized fly ash is a type of pozzolans. It is a siliceous or aluminous material which possesses no binding ability by itself. When it is in finely divided form, they can react with calcium hydroxide in the presence of moisture to form compounds with cementing properties. During cement hydration with water, calcium hydroxide is formed which is non-cementitious in nature. However, when pulverized fly ash is added to calcium hydroxide, they react to produce calcium silicate hydrates which is highly cementitious. This results in improved

concrete strength. This explains how pulverized fly ash can act as cement replacement.

PFA vs GGBS

(i) Similarities: 

Both GGBS and PFA are by-products of industry and the use of them is environmentally friendly. Most importantly, with GBS and PFA adopted as partial replacement of cement, the demand for cement will be drastically reduced. As the manufacture of one tonne of cement generates about 1 tonne of carbon dioxide, the environment could be conserved by using less cement through partial replacement of PFA and GGBS. 

On the other hand, the use of GGBS and PFA as partial replacement of cement enhances the long-term durability of concrete in terms of resistance to chloride attack, sulphate attack and alkali-silica reaction. It follows that the structure would remain to be serviceable for longer period, leading to substantial cost saving. Apart from the consideration of long-term durability, the use of PFA and GGBS results in the reduction of heat of hydration so that the problem of thermal cracking is greatly reduced. The enhanced control of thermal movement also contributes to better and long-term performance of concrete.

In terms of the development of strength, PFA and GGBS shared the common observation of lower initial strength development and higher final concrete strength. Hence, designers have to take into account the potential demerit of lower strength development and may make use of the merit of higher final concrete strength in design.

(ii) Differences Between GGBS and PFA

The use of GGBS as replacement of cement enhances smaller reliance on PFA. In particular, GGBS is considered to be more compatible with renewable energy source objectives. The replacement level of GGBS can be as high as 70% of cement, which is about twice as much of PFA (typically replacement level is 40%). Hence, partial replacement of GGBS can enable higher reduction of cement content. As the manufacture of one tonne of cement generates about 1 tonne of carbon dioxide and it is considered more environmentally friendly to adopt GGBS owing to its potential higher level of cement replacement.

The performance of bleeding for GGBS and PFA varies. With PFA, bleeding is found to decrease owing to increased volume of fines. However, the amount of bleeding of GGBS is found to increase when compared with OPC concrete in the long term. On the other hand, drying shrinkage is higher for GGBS concrete while it is lower for PFA concrete. In terms of cost consideration, the current market price of GGBS is similar to that of PFA. As the potential replacement of GGBS is much higher than PFA, substantial cost savings can be made by using GGBS.

Purpose of setting minimum amount of longitudinal steel areas for columns

In some design codes it specifies that the area of longitudinal steel reinforcement should be not less than a certain percentage of the sectional area of column. Firstly, the limitation of steel ratio for columns helps to guard against potential failure in tension. Tension may be induced in columns during the design life of the concrete structures. For instance, tension is induced in columns in case there is uneven settlement of the building foundation, or upper floors above the column are totally unloaded while the floors below the column are severely loaded. Secondly, owing to the effect of creep and shrinkage, there will be a redistribution of loads between concrete and steel reinforcement. Consequently, the steel reinforcement may yield easily in case a lower limit of steel area is not established. 

In addition, test results showed that columns with too low a steel ratio would render the equation below inapplicable which is used for the design of columns:

                                      N=0.67fcuAc+fyAs